Dave Michels’ posterous

 

If you don’t know what you are doing, stop selling businesses VoIP!! | Technoramblings of the digitally insane

If you don’t know what you are doing, stop selling businesses VoIP!!

VN:F [1.6.8_931]
please wait...
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)

angry-on-the-phoneI have seen it time and time again.  A small business with multiple phone lines, wants to save money by switching over to VoIP.

The business owner, usually not knowing anything about the technology other than it can save them money on phone bills, typically hires an outside consultant to come in and revamp their inner office workings.

Equipment is ordered the system is built and installed, and everything seems like it is working.

Then the problems creep up…  Call quality issues, from echo, to voice stutter, to the complete inability to make a call to specific phone numbers or making calls at all, render the newly installed system virtually unusable in a functioning day to day business.

Case in point, a medical office I visited today.

A good family friend had fallen prey to the unsavory business practices of a local IT company and their “Great VoIP System” which was installed a few years back.  He had told me a few nights before my office visit of his call quality issues and general distaste for the company he had hired as they seemed unwilling, or were unable to resolve his issues.  He then told me that he was paying them a monthly maintenance fee for his phone system and his computers of nearly $450 a month on top of what he was paying for the VoIP phone service.

When I arrived at the office today, I spent a few minutes in the waiting room waiting for the owner to arrive, and I was able to speak with the receptionist and get her input on the phone system and its issues. She recounted the call issues and failures, as well as standard business phone features that were non-existent or that just did not work properly.

The picture started getting clearer. At which point my family friend arrived and took me back to the server room.

Upon inspection of the office equipment I quickly realized what the problem boiled down to.

The company hired to install said phone system did everything they could to leave the end user with problems down the road.

Now on a normal VoIP deployment that I do I insist on certain things.  Those being a Cisco router and a Cisco switch. Why? Because they work and they work well.  You can program them to do just about anything and for a VoIP deployment that is critical to eliminating problems.

This company looks like they went to the local Best Buy, grabbed whatever they thought they might need and headed out to do this shoddy install.

Here are a few key issues with this install:

  1. The T1 Router used…  I have never seen anything like it before, not to say it is total garbage as I have not had the time to really inspect it, but a good Cisco router it is not.
  2. The switch used… an unmanageable, off the shelf, home consumer based product, which was providing connectivity but nothing else.
  3. The worst wiring termination job I have ever seen.

All three are very common, dare I say, Rookie mistakes I see regularly, and they were all present at this office.

No wonder call quality issues were so prevalent. This office deployment was using less than satisfactory equipment. The switch does not support QOS (Quality of Service) rules to help the telephone voice traffic flow properly on their network and back to their provider Broadvox, and who knows if it even supports VLAN IDs to differentiate traffic on their internal network at all.

Now if that were not bad enough, this so called “IT Company” then overcharged this office for phones (Grandstream GXP-2000) and for a phone server, which does not have the most basic of features enabled, such as intercom and call parking or find me-follow me, and that system is not being backed up, or even maintained for the $450 a month service charge.

First problem to solve, Junk equipment.

By getting better equipment on the back end I will eliminate most problems the end users have been hearing while attempting to make or receive  calls.

Second problem to solve, missing phone system features & backups.

I will be setting up a new phone server for less than $500 which will be using the PBX in A Flash distribution of Asterisk.  It will support every possible feature asterisk has to offer, and will be backed up nightly so no voicemail or system configuration is ever lost. Switch from Broadvox, to Nexvortex, as the rates at Broadvox are about to go up significantly.

Third problem to solve, Grandstream Phones.

For now I will continue to use these as they have 15 of them and while they are not such great phones the users already know how to use them, which will eliminate training on new devices, and the replacement cost is just not justifiable at this time.

But the real question is, Why wasn’t this done to begin with?

The IT company hired previously either didn’t know or just didn’t care and left their clients in the worst possible situation.

So my advice to any business owner would be:

If you want VoIP for your business, get multiple quotes,  get the names and numbers of other businesses who they have done installs for. CALL THOSE BUSINESSES and ask about their phone system.

I have found that clients who are happy with their systems love to talk about how great they work and how much money they are saving, some of my clients will even let me use their offices for a demo.

© 2009, Technoramblings of the digitally insane. All rights reserved.

VN:F [1.6.8_931]

Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
Share and Enjoy:

  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Digg

  • Google Bookmarks

  • del.icio.us

  • E-mail this story to a friend!

  • LinkedIn

  • Turn this article into a PDF!

  • Print this article!

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Wednesday, September 30th, 2009 and is filed under 1. General Ramblings, 6. Telecommunications. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Google Boosts Gmail For Android, iPhone -- GMail -- InformationWeek

  • Email this page E-mail
  • |  Print Print
  • |   Bookmark and Share

  • icon

  • Buzz up!
  • Google Boosts Gmail For Android, iPhone


    The tweaks show that Google is committed to improving the Web-based version of its e-mail service.

    By --> Marin Perez
    InformationWeek

    September 25, 2009 04:02 PM

    " /> Google (NSDQ: GOOG) continues to improve the mobile version of its e-mail service, and has made a few improvements to the Web-based Gmail for Android and Apple's iPhone platforms.

    The company is bringing the "Move" feature from the desktop to the mobile phone, and users can now label and archive messages in a single step. This is achieved by moving an e-mail thread to a certain predetermined label. The Gmail inbox also automatically refreshes when users switch to it from another tab or application, and if the phone goes to sleep, the inbox will refresh when it wakes up.

    The most recent improvements are not revolutionary, but show that Google is committed to improving the Web-based version of its e-mail service. In April, the company retooled Gmail for the iPhone and Android by using HTML5 and Gears to provide a faster experience even with intermittent data connectivity.

    While both mobile platforms have native mail clients and apps that can be used to get Gmail on-the-go, the Web-based version does not require the end user to install software, and can be used as an icon on the phone's home screen. While mobile apps are becoming increasingly popular thanks to the success of the App Store for the iPhone and iPod Touch, Google has said it believes the mobile Web will be vital in future app development because it is becoming too expensive to support and create programs for a wide variety of mobile platforms.

    While Google is also motivated to move mobile users online, because this subjects more people to its lucrative Web advertising business, companies such as Palm and Nokia have also said the underlying mobile operating system is becoming less important than the layers on top, including those delivered through a browser.


    InformationWeek has published an in-depth report on the use of business software on smartphones. Download the report here (registration required).



    -->

    Add Your Comment:

    Please login or register here for a free Techweb account to post

    Subscribe to RSS



    Advertisement
    Click Here


    SPONSORED LINKS
    Buy a Link Now

    Loading mentions Retweet

    Comments [0]

    And the Largest Broadband Stimulus Application Goes to . . . EchoStar?

    Email this

    Twitter this

    Delicious this

    More choices

    Broadband Stimulus Featured Article

    back | view all articles

    September 25, 2009

    And the Largest Broadband Stimulus Application Goes to . . . EchoStar?


    By Michael Dinan, TMCnet Editor

    Just a few months after on its major divisions forged a deal to deliver its flagship video transport service to a communications provider in Georgia, an Englewood, Colo.-based company that specializes in digital TV entertainment, set-top boxes, and end-to-end video delivery systems reportedly has emerged in an ambitious broadband stimulus package that seeks $483 million funds.

    According to the Denver Business Journal, EchoStar Corp. is joining Carlsbad, Calif.-based ViaSat (News - Alert) Inc. According to Greg Avery, it’s one of at least three projects in which EchoStar is involved, seeking a total $1.1 billion-plus in stimulus money. That would make make EchoStar the largest single applicant for the broadband stimulus funds. as the two seek money for a new satellite.

    “EchoStar and ViaSat (News - Alert) would invest between $36 million and $114 million toward the satellite, depending on how much in stimulus money they win, if any,” Avery reports. “The project is estimated to cost $519 million. The satellite would provide download speeds of up to 8 megabits per second in all or parts of 20 states west of the Mississippi River, including Colorado, the application said.”

    EchoStar could not immediately be reached for comment.

    In July, as TMCnet reportedRinggold Telephone Company to deliver transport of 42 popular high definition TV channels to its IP headend., the company forged a deal with

    The technology provides digital interactive video service NexTV to its subscribers along with telephone and Internet access via a broadband connection. The EchoStar ViP-TV delivered IP channels will be immediately available to RTC subscribers. The new additions increase RTC’s offerings to a total of 48 high-definition channels.

    The new broadband stimulus deal is a far larger fish.

    The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act – better known as the “economic stimulus package” made $7.2 billion available to extend high-speed Internet to unserved and under-served areas.

    As Avery noted, EchoStar and ViaSat would invest between $36 million and $114 million toward the satellite, depending on how much in stimulus money they win, if any. The project is estimated to cost $519 million, he said.

    “The satellite would provide download speeds of up to 8 megabits per second in all or parts of 20 states west of the Mississippi River, including Colorado, the application said,” Avery reported.

    Michael Dinan is a contributing editor for TMCnet, covering news in the IP communications, call center and customer relationship management industries. To read more of Michael's articles, please visit his columnist page.

    Edited by Michael Dinan

    Loading mentions Retweet

    Comments [0]

    New Google Sites API Takes Aim at Enterprises

    FileGoogle is releasing an API for Google Sites, a product that lets you create and share web sites easily, to developers today, continuing an effort by the search giant to get businesses to adopt its products. Because the Mountain View, Calif.-based company plans to add features to the API, it can be found in Google Labs, the testing ground for half-baked product ideas.

    Once again, Google is looking to draw enterprises away from relying on Microsoft and IBM products; the API enables developers to easily transfer files and content from Lotus Notes and Microsoft SharePoint to Google Sites. It also can be used by sales teams to automatically update their Google Sites pages with any new leads they’ve added to their CRM (customer relationship management) systems. The new API supports most of the functions that the original Google Sites product offers, including the ability to modify pages and content, upload information from other Google Apps to a site, and provide a history of revisions made on a site. Yet after Gmail’s meltdown this morning, the company is going to have to majorly step up its game to convince cloud-wary businesses to use its Apps suite of enterprise products.

    Loading mentions Retweet

    Comments [0]

    InSecurity Complex: By Elinor Mills - CNET News

    When I sat down to write an article about the unreliable cell reception my iPhone gets on Monday, I knew I wasn't alone in my frustration. Friends and acquaintances often joke that the iPhone is a cool computer but a lousy phone.

    But judging from the response I received from the "AT&T takes the phone out of iPhone" story published on Tuesday, I definitely struck a nerve with a lot of iPhone users, not just in San Francisco but around the country. The overwhelming majority of them reported similar problems of frequent and consistent dropped calls and garbled conversations, and even delays with voice messages and voice mail being inaccessible.

    Within one work day the article generated more than 300 comments and 150 e-mails, more feedback volume than any story I've written before. I spent much of the day reading them and doing some additional reporting and I've come to some basic understandings that I'd like to share:

    This is not a San Francisco-only problem
    I neglected to mention in the original story that I never, repeat never get reliable reception on my iPhone in either of my parents' homes in Phoenix. Fortunately the weather is usually pleasant and I can easily step outside to talk.

    Meanwhile, criticism of iPhone reception came in from people in dozens of locations. Numerous complaints came from cities like New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Atlanta, Washington, D.C., Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, San Diego, Seattle, Denver, and Charlotte, N.C. There were complaints from people in Texas, Arizona, Oregon, South Carolina, Florida, Indiana, Colorado, Washington, Ohio, New Jersey, Virginia, Maryland, Utah, Montana, Michigan, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and even Oahu, among other locales.

    "What really sucks is that I can circumnavigate the mean back streets of New Delhi with iPhone in hand, email specific scriptures from my ibible or scan songs I've never heard before in a restaurant to find out who the artist is, yet I cannot conduct a PHONE conversation in my own living room or even from my home office while looking out a south-facing window into bright sunshine! I drop 8 out of 10 calls, and sometimes don't get voicemails until a DAY later," wrote a Tulsa, Okla., reader.

    "This sounds like a joke, but it is an actual fact: I get better reception and service for my iPhone in a grain silo in my grandmother's rural Indiana farm than I do in my bedroom in Los Angeles. Seriously," wrote another person.

    "Recently I was in the emergency room with mother for 12 hours. I had no cell service. Now I have an iPhone 3G and a Blackberry Curve, both with AT&T. Neither worked. Yet the lady next to my mother and a woman across from us both had perfect service. One used Sprint, the other Verizon," another reader wrote.

    A San Luis Obispo, Calif., reader said he gets no iPhone 3G reception on many stretches of Highway 101.

    "Last Friday I was heading south on 101 at the Cuesta Grade and got stuck in a nightmarish traffic jam due to an accident at the base of the grade," he wrote. "I tried calling my wife to let her know that I was going to be late, but guess what? No cell coverage. That's not the half of it...Apparently a bit up the grade from me, a 71-year-old man had a heart attack...A family member tried calling 911 but as the (San Luis Obispo Tribune) indicated, the call failed. The family member actually flagged down a CHP helicopter that was covering the accident to get help."

    Some people complained that even though AT&T claims the coverage in their area is good, their first-hand experience indicates otherwise. A handful said they dropped AT&T and the iPhone because of the poor reception. A couple of people said they chose to modify their iPhones (also known as jailbreaking) so that they could use them on a different carrier's network and that the reception was vastly improved.

    "I live in Columbia, SC---no big city here. My damn iPhone drops calls about 75 percent of the time inside my house," wrote another reader. "Definitely an issue with ATTs network, not my house. ATTs web map for the city claims excellent coverage (joke)."

    One New Yorker was so moved by the issue that he wrote a letter to AT&T voicing his complaints and then made a video about his experience.

    Several Canada iPhone users said they get good reception from Rogers Communications, but one U.K.-based reader said that on the network of iPhone carrier O2 he can't make calls at peak times and voice mails and texts can take more than an hour to arrive.

    Not everyone who provided feedback reported a negative experience, but the ratio was about 5-to-1 in agreement with my experience or similar problems. People seemed genuinely grateful to find out that they weren't alone in experiencing these troubles.

    It's not just a problem with the iPhone
    About two dozen people reported that they had problems with other phones on the AT&T network than the iPhone, and a few noted that other carrier networks also have problems, too.

    "You'd have the same problem with any phone using AT&T service," Andrew Seybold, a wireless consultant with Santa Barbara, Calif.-based Andrew Seybold Inc., said in an interview. "In other parts of the country people complain about other networks more than they do about AT&T. It's a very regional thing."

    Seybold and Roger Entner, head of telecom research at Nielsen, said AT&T and others were doing what they could to improve the reception situation. But the carriers have been hindered in their efforts by reluctant and slow-moving municipalities whose residents don't want additional cell sites to be installed either because they are unsightly or because of health concerns about the radio frequency emissions, they said.

    "In defense of AT&T and all the networks, they have billion-dollar budgets to add more cell sites to get better coverage and add more capacity, but because of city and county planning commission stuff it takes two to three years in most places in the country to get a new cell site put in," Seybold said.

    "There is a federal law that says you can't inhibit these towers, but nobody wants to have it in their backyard. But they all want to have perfect wireless service and it doesn't work," Entner said in an interview. "Frequently, the carriers have to go to court to build a tower."

    Jonas Ionin, who is with the San Francisco Planning Department, disagreed with that characterization of the situation.

    "It is not fair to categorize it (the problem) as the process that's been set up," he said. "I think they are maybe overzealous in their time frame."

    San Francisco officials have been working with AT&T to expedite the process to help the carrier meet its commitment to Apple so that new apps roll out by a certain date, according to Ionin. "Their 3G marketing service didn't live up to its billing," he said.

    Meanwhile, the city hasn't received a lot of new applications from carriers for new cell sites but has seen applications for modifications to existing sites, he added.

    Thick, concrete walls are likely blocking my reception
    I found out from an AT&T customer support representative on the phone that my home in San Francisco is in an area with good cell coverage and that I am located right in the middle of four sites, an estimated half-mile away from the nearest one.

    "Radio waves don't penetrate building walls very well and if you have tinted windows in an office building, that's near death to a radio signal," said Seybold. "Maybe you're not close enough to a cell site, but you are also competing with others in your area" for reception.

    AT&T is increasing its 850MHz band frequency, which travels shorter distances than the current 1900MHz frequency, but is better able to penetrate into buildings. But licenses for 850MHz are not automatically granted, according to Seybold, and its unclear whether that is an option in my neighborhood.

    Since the AT&T customer service representative said the company doesn't plan to erect any additional cell sites in my neighborhood, I may have to just wait until AT&T offers a MicroCell signal booster they call femtocell that works by using a customer's home broadband network. The device, which costs $150, is being tested in a public market trial in Charlotte, N.C.

    Supposedly there are ways for neighbors to piggyback off the signal, just like with a Wi-Fi, but Seybold said his understanding is that there is a way to secure it.

    In the meantime, I could use a Zboost, a type of cell signal booster device that extends coverage in buildings and cars, according to a spokeswoman for the company that makes them, Wi-Ex.

    "There's no network in the U.S. that's going to provide adequate indoor coverage for everybody," Seybold said.

    AT&T doesn't typically offer refunds for outages, and frequent problems like mine
    One reader wrote that he got a $50 refund after complaining to AT&T about his poor iPhone reception, but I had no such luck when I called the company.

    "That's not something we're allowed to credit for per our policy," the customer service representative told me when I asked. "Even if the service outage was for three or four days, or a week," he said, noting that customers in Kentucky were not given refunds after an outage caused by a bad ice storm.

    Many of my remaining questions, like why exactly I have reception problems and when the femtocell will be available in San Francisco, remain unanswered as I awaited word back from AT&T spokesman Mark Siegel, who had repeatedly insisted that my complaints and those of other iPhone users were not newsworthy. (He claims the increased data traffic from 3G iPhone users is affecting performance, but I use a first-generation iPhone which runs on a different network than 3G and on which data and voice traffic are separated.)

    I can be patient. I already have been.

    A good friend asked me why it took me one and a half years of inadequate iPhone reception to get frustrated enough to cover the issue. I likened the situation to a new boyfriend who so distracts you with his good looks, charm, and intellect that for a while you don't really notice that he's cheating on you. However, a relationship that is unreliable and untrustworthy eventually takes its toll, no matter how good other aspects may be.

    The honeymoon is definitely over for me and my iPhone, although I'm not sure I'm ready for divorce just yet.

    Loading mentions Retweet

    Comments [0]

    Alternatives to Windows, Mac, Linux and online software

    alternatives for all major products.

    Loading mentions Retweet

    Comments [0]